The RF Supreme Court began publishing letters from people wishing to influence the court's decision

Complaint to the Supreme Court in a civil case

The Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, as amended in force from February 1, 2003 to January 2008, limits the period of a supervisory complaint to one year from the date the appealed decision enters into legal force.

Finally, Federal Law No. 330-FZ of December 4, 2007, which came into force in January 2008 and amended the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, limits the period of a supervisory complaint to six months from the date the appealed decision entered into legal force.

Articles on the topic (click to view)

5 basic rules for maintaining a book of reviews and suggestions at an enterprise

There are a number of additional nuances that distinguish the procedure for filing a supervisory complaint in civil proceedings since January 2008 from the one that previously took place.

Thus, according to the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, as amended, which was in force before the amendments introduced by Federal Law No. 330 of December 4, 2007, paragraph 2 of Article 381 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation provided that the judge, based on the results of the supervisory complaint, made one of two determinations: or a determination on filing a case with a supervisory court, or on refusing such a claim.

Sample complaint to the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

() must be submitted to the name or his deputy.

The Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation takes into account a separate period for filing such a complaint - 4 months from the date of entry of the appealed court orders into legal force. And the question of the constitutionality of such differentiation. in our opinion. must be the subject of an audit by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Order of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 2007 N? 2-P announced the legal position on the possibility of challenging unmotivated decisions of arbitrators in courts: a sample agreement on changing territorial jurisdiction.

Law Club Conference

But since the Code of Criminal Procedure is modestly silent on this matter, and the Supreme Court does not explain anything, defenders and convicts, following the principle “you can’t spoil the porridge with butter,” file it as a “cassation appeal.” I personally used to write them without any title or call them petitions, they were considered, the answer was given by the chairman or deputy. But after January 1, 2013, when repetition was prohibited and the term was limited, I, not wanting to take risks, succumbed to the herd instinct and also began filing a “cassation appeal.”

But the question still requires clarification; everything rebels in me when I call this appeal a cassation appeal.

What can the Chairman of the Supreme Council do and what can he ask him for?

The Chairman of the Supreme Court is the “big boss” in the judicial system. But it is precisely within the procedural framework of the complaint to the Chairman (Part 5 401.10 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) that he can only once again examine the complaint, say “my friend, you are wrong” to the lower judge of the Supreme Court, who previously “dismissed” the complaint - and transfer the complaint for consideration to the hearing.

He himself cannot make a final decision on the complaint, cancel or change the verdict.

Accordingly, you can only ask him for one thing - “I ask you to transfer the cassation appeal for consideration at the meeting.”

Supervisory complaint to the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

1 tbsp. 47 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, no one can be deprived of the right to have his case considered in the court and by the judge whose jurisdiction it is assigned to.

In accordance with Art. 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, claims for rights to land plots, subsoil plots, buildings, including residential and non-residential premises, structures, structures, and other objects firmly connected with the land, are brought to court at the location of these objects or seized property.

Since I am challenging the ownership of the apartment, which is located in the ________ district of the city.

Samples of cassation appeals to the chairman of the supreme court

Complaints and messages to the Qualification Board of Judges from citizens may. judges or referral for verification to the chairman of the relevant or higher court. SAMPLE COMPLAINT. Dancing for boys video

sample complaint to the chairman of the court against a judge

A private complaint may be filed against the judge's ruling. To the chairman of the court in writing through the secretariat or by. Complaint against the judge - Kobzev and partners

Complaint to the Qualification Board of Judges. - DISPUTE.

However, after repeated appeals, first to Judge Neverova, then to the Chairman of the Court Alisov, and then again to the judge. After writing a complaint against a judge, as a rule, the screaming stops. failure to notify the parties is a reason to write a complaint to the Chairman of the court.

Lawyer Edward Kim. Complaint about the actions of inaction of judges

Sample complaint to the chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for civil cases

We will consider only civil cases and general courts. The complaint is submitted to the Chairman of the Court, and not to the Presidium of the Court. Protocol for the removal of samples from M for comparative research /t. Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 8 of October 31, 1995. Cassation appeal against a court decision in a civil case.

Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, if Art. Cassation instance of the judicial board for civil cases of the Chelyabinsk Regional Court dated January 27, 1997. The essence of the matter is that I paid money to another person as a deposit.

The Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, in a cassation ruling dated April 17, 2000 in the case of Nikitin A. Afghan, also refused to transfer the case to supervisory review.

Sample application addressed to the chairman of the court

If it’s not difficult, please provide a link to a sample application addressed to the chairman of the court. and it’s not clear what exactly to demand.

The actions of the judge, in essence, are a sophisticated form of bullying against me - a law-abiding citizen of the Russian Federation, who, among other things, is currently on maternity leave to care for a child. When using materials and quoting, a link (for Internet resources a hyperlink) to the site is required spros. Not only citizens, but also legal entities (individual entrepreneurs), whose cases are heard in arbitration courts, can go to court due to delays.

Meetings were held at the Arbitration Court of the Ivanovo Region on the results of the activities of the Arbitration Court for 2014. On January 30, 2014, meetings were held at the Arbitration Court of the Ivanovo Region on the results of the activities of the Arbitration Court for 2014. In other words, if it turns out that the court hearing was postponed 15 times due to the applicant’s fault (for example, because of his illness or because he filed various petitions, etc. Only when at a personal meeting did I say that I needed a decision, otherwise I would complain. Again began to threaten me with a complaint, the judge started calling me personally and trying to persuade me not to complain.

But as I understand in your case, he was initially on regular vacation, and only then became involved in an accident, the outcome of which is unknown to you. But the decision stood up well in cassation, I’m sure because the judges consulted. The judge returned from sick leave, but there is still no court decision (ruling). We’ve been waiting for more than a month to receive a decision and there’s been no progress, the assistants just brush it off, saying that there’s a lot to do and everyone just go and wait, although I don’t think that’s an adequate reason! And the office just rolls its eyes and replies that not much time has passed You can wait a lot, too.

The decision was issued 20 days after the meeting, although according to the Civil Code it should have been no later than 5. Judges especially like to delay writing and issuing a decision if they are not sure that it will stand up to cassation.

Statement to the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

Cassation appeal to the chairman of the Supreme Court.

I am filing a complaint against the actions of the court, because so far it has not. Applications addressed to the chairman of the court are submitted to the expedition.

Cassation appeal to the Chairman of the Supreme Court

Good afternoon The problem is the following: the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation refused to transfer the case to the judicial panel of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for consideration at a court hearing in cassation procedure. We want to file a cassation appeal with the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

Question: is this complaint filed only against the refused ruling of a judge of the Supreme Court or against rulings of courts of all instances? The content of a cassation appeal to the Chairman of the Supreme Court will be the same as to the Judicial Collegium of the Supreme Court? And ask for the cancellation of only the refusal ruling of the Supreme Court judge or for the cancellation of rulings of courts of all instances? Thanks in advance.

Hello Marina, if you have gone through all the authorities and you have already been refused by the RF Armed Forces, then I am attaching the petition part as a sample from the draft of my application addressed to the Chairman:

based on Art. Art. 381, 384, 390 Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, 163, 167 Civil Code of the Russian Federation I ask:

agree with the ruling of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on January __, 2014 to refuse

transfer of a cassation appeal for consideration at a court hearing

cassation instance and make a ruling on its cancellation and transfer to the cassation

complaints for consideration in a court session of the cassation court. I beg

request from ___ district

rulings of the federal judge ______ district court of Moscow Chernova O.A. dated __ 2013 and the appeal ruling of the Moscow City

court dated _____ 2013 and resolve the issue on the merits.”

Example of a cassation appeal against a decision in a civil case to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

630099, Novosibirsk,

st. Yadrintsevskaya, __, office __

Third party: State Labor Inspectorate in the Novosibirsk Region

630091, Novosibirsk, Krasny prospect, 82

APPEAL

(1) on the decision of the ___________ district court of Novosibirsk dated ______ January 2014 in civil case No. _____/2014 on the claim of Petrov Petrovich against NAME LLC to invalidate the act of form N-1 on an industrial accident dated June 18, 2013 year, (2) against the ruling of the Civil Cases Board of the Novosibirsk Regional Court dated April 3, 2014 based on the results of the consideration of the plaintiff’s appeal against the said decision of the court of first instance, (3) against the ruling of the judge of the Novosibirsk Regional Court dated August 1, 2014 on refusal to transfer cassation appeal for consideration in a court session of the court of cassation

On January 22, 2014, the ________ district court of Novosibirsk made a decision in a civil case based on the claim of Petrov P.P. to NAME LLC to invalidate the Form N-1 act on an industrial accident dated June 18, 2013. The demands were rejected in full.

On April 3, 2014, the Novosibirsk Regional Court, based on the results of consideration of the plaintiff’s appeal, left this decision unchanged. By the ruling of the judge of the Novosibirsk Regional Court dated August 1, 2014, the applicants were denied the transfer of a cassation appeal against the above-mentioned judicial acts for consideration at a court session of the cassation court.

In the framework of this civil case, the plaintiff challenged the form N-1 report drawn up by the defendant NAME LLC about an industrial accident dated June 18, 2013, which happened to him on March 14, 2013.

The courts made these decisions, with which the plaintiff does not agree, and believes that they were made with a significant violation of the norms of both substantive and procedural law, which influenced the outcome of the case, without eliminating which it is impossible to restore and protect the violated rights of the plaintiff.

(The cassation appeal further sets out the reasons why the submitter considers the contested judicial acts to be incorrect and subject to cancellation or amendment).

Based on the aforesaid and guided by Article. 376 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation,

to cancel the decision of the _________ district court of Novosibirsk dated January 22, 2014 in civil case No. _______/2014 on the claim of Petrov Petrovich against NAME LLC to invalidate the act of form N-1 on an industrial accident, determination of the Novosibirsk College of Civil Cases regional court dated April 3, 2014 based on the results of consideration of the plaintiff’s appeal against the said decision of the court of first instance and the ruling of the judge of the Novosibirsk Regional Court dated August 1, 2014 on the refusal to transfer the cassation appeal for consideration in a court session of the cassation court and to send the case for a new trial to the ________ district court of Novosibirsk with a different composition of judges.

APPLICATION:

1. Copies of the cassation appeal (4 copies)

2. Copy of the decision of the _________ district court of Novosibirsk dated January 22, 2014 in civil case No. _______/2014

3. A copy of the ruling of the Civil Chamber of the Novosibirsk Regional Court dated April 3, 2014 based on the results of consideration of the appeal against the said decision of the court of first instance

4. A copy of the ruling of the judge of the Novosibirsk Regional Court dated August 1, 2014 on the refusal to transfer the cassation appeal for consideration at the court hearing of the cassation court

What should be included in the complaint?

The complaint must contain arguments on the basis of which the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation or one of his deputies can cancel the decision of the reporting judge. In most cases, decisions to refuse to transfer a cassation appeal are poorly motivated, which makes it possible to once again state all the circumstances of the case and prove the existence of the right to cassation appeal of a court decision.

There is no state fee for filing a complaint against a refusal to transfer a cassation.

A sample complaint about refusal to transfer a cassation appeal can be found on our website. Although such a complaint can be written in free form, being, in its legal essence, an ordinary letter, a correct presentation of all the circumstances of the case significantly increases the chances of its satisfaction.

Supervisory complaint to the Chairman of the Supreme Court

To the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in a civil case in the claim of ____________________ to _____ “______” to appeal the decision of _______ “_______” dated ____________

The state duty is: based on clause 4, part 1, art. 333.19 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is ___ rubles.

SUPERVISORY COMPLAINT

on the decision of the _____________ district court of _____________ dated _____________, the Determination of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the __________ city court dated ______________, the Determination of the judge of the __________ city court dated ___________, the Determination of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated _____________, the response of the Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated ___________ ____________ of the year

By the decision of the ______________ district court of _______ dated ___________, I was denied satisfaction of my claims against ___ “_______” to appeal the decision of the Federal State Institution “_________” dated ____________, establishing the percentage of loss of professional ability and disability. By the ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the ___________ city court dated _________, the decision of the ____________ District Court of the city ______ dated _____________ was left unchanged, and my cassation appeal was left without consideration. By the ruling of the judge of the __________ city court dated __________ in the transfer of a supervisory appeal __________ against the decision of the _____________ district court of ______ dated ___________, the ruling of the judicial panel for civil cases of the _________ city court dated ______________ in a civil case on the claim of ______________ to ____ "________" for recognition illegal and cancellation of the decision, the obligation to establish the percentage of loss of professional ability and disability group for consideration in a court session of the supervisory court was refused.

By a ruling of a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated _________, the transfer of a supervisory appeal for consideration at a court hearing to the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation was refused. According to the response of the Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated ____________, the statement of claim ___________ to ___ “________” was considered in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the manner of supervision. There are no grounds for disagreement with the ruling of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

With the indicated decisions of the ____________ district court of ________ dated _____________, the ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the __________ city court dated ____________, the ruling of the judge of the _________ city court dated ___________, the ruling of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated ____________, the response of the Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from __________ year I do not agree, I consider them illegal, unfounded and subject to cancellation on the following grounds: According to Art. 387 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the grounds for canceling or changing a court decision in the manner of supervision are significant violations of substantive or procedural law that influenced the outcome of the case, without eliminating which it is impossible to restore and protect violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, as well as the protection of public interests protected by law .

In refusing to satisfy the claims, the court of first instance refers to the opinion of expert _________ that there are no grounds for determining the percentage of loss of professional ability to work, since _________’s occupational disease was detected a significant time after his dismissal from the airline due to staff reduction.

However, these court statements are not true.

Based on Art. 195 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court decision must be lawful and justified, and in accordance with Art. 196 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, when making a decision, the court evaluates the evidence, determines which circumstances relevant to the consideration of the case have been established and which circumstances have not been established, what are the legal relations of the parties, what law should be applied in this case and whether the claim is subject to satisfaction.

In the period from __________ to ____________, I worked as a flight engineer in various airlines. ____________ I was fired due to staff reduction.

In connection with my intention to get a job at an airline in my specialty, I underwent a mandatory medical examination. Based on paragraph 1 of Art. 1 of the Federal Aviation Rules “Medical examination of summer, dispatch personnel, flight attendants, cadets and candidates entering civil aviation educational institutions”, approved by Order of the Ministry of Trust of Russia dated April 22, 2002 No. 50, the following are subject to mandatory medical examination: flight crew members: pilots commercial aviation (airplane and helicopter), airline line pilots (airplane and helicopter), navigators, flight engineers, flight mechanics, flight radio operators, observation pilots.

Based on the results of the medical examination, a medical report is issued, which is an integral part of the aviation personnel certificate. However, I was unable to renew my medical certificate and flight engineer certificate for medical reasons; on ____________, a doctor at clinic No. __ diagnosed me with: bilateral sensorineural hearing loss of __ degree.

From the extract from the sanitary journal No. _________ it follows that the disease of the hearing organ is occupational. By the decision of the Central Medical Flight Expert Commission of Civil Aviation, I was denied the issuance of a Medical Certificate of fitness for flight work due to non-compliance with the Requirements of the FAP MO GA-____, Art. 63.2 gr.II.

However, as a result of my application with a full set of documents, the district and city ITU refused to establish my disability due to an occupational disease and the percentage of loss of professional ability. I appealed the decision of the ITU bodies to the Federal Bureau of ITU, but the decision remained unchanged; no grounds were found for determining disability and establishing the degree of loss of professional disability.

The court of first instance bases its decision on the expert opinion _________ However, this conclusion could not be used as the basis for the court’s decision, since it was the expert opinion _________, as biased and illegal, as indicated in the updated statement of claim submitted by me, that was appealed in court.

The court of the first, cassation and supervisory instances did not take into account my arguments that the expert ___________ carried out the examination, signed the examination report, the answer ________ ITU FB dated __________, the response to my statement of claim. Consequently, the specified expert is an interested party and was personally interested in the refusal to satisfy my claims.

In fact, without special knowledge in the field of medicine, the court independently made a conclusion about the severity of functional disorders of the body. According to Art. 79 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, when issues arise during the consideration of a case that require special knowledge in various fields of science, technology, art, craft, the court appoints an examination.

The examination may be entrusted to a forensic institution, a specific expert, or several experts. Each of the parties and other persons participating in the case has the right to present to the court issues to be resolved during the examination. The final range of issues on which an expert opinion is required is determined by the court. The court must provide reasons for rejecting the proposed questions.

The parties and other persons participating in the case have the right to ask the court to order an examination at a specific forensic institution or to entrust it to a specific expert; challenge the expert; formulate questions for the expert; familiarize yourself with the court’s ruling on the appointment of an expert examination and the questions formulated therein; get acquainted with the expert’s opinion; petition the court to order a repeated, additional, comprehensive or commission examination. During the trial, I filed a petition to order a forensic medical examination, but by a court ruling dated ______________, the petition was groundlessly denied.

In addition, in the decision, the court refers to the fact that the professional activity of a flight engineer does not precede the establishment of an occupational disease, since it was terminated in ____, and after that I carried out the professional activity of an electrical engineer for a year, the disease was established in ____. Based on clause 5 of the Rules for determining the degree of loss of professional ability to work as a result of industrial accidents and occupational diseases, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated _____________ No. ___, as well as temporary criteria for determining the degree of loss of professional ability to work as a result of industrial accidents and occupational diseases, approved by Decree of the Ministry of Labor and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. __ dated ___________, the degree of loss of professional ability to work should be determined depending on the ability of the victim to perform professional activities in his previous specialty or position.

When making its decision, the court did not take into account the notification of the Scientific Research Institute of Occupational Medicine of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences dated _____________ and the report on the case of an occupational disease dated ______________. Consequently, the ITU bodies determined the loss not of professional ability to work, but of general ability to work, with which the court of the first, cassation and supervisory instances agreed.

As a result of the examination by the Federal Bureau of ITU in the __________ year, the decision ____ “_______________” was not changed, due to the fact that at the time the occupational disease was diagnosed, I was not carrying out professional activities.

The court agreed with the defendant's arguments. However, I would like to draw the court’s attention to the fact that none of the regulations regulating the determination of disability and the percentage of loss of ability to work contain the condition that at the time of the examination the victim must carry out professional activities. I stated this during the trial, but the court did not take my statements into account.

The court baselessly refers to the fact that after leaving the airline as a flight engineer, I worked for a year as an electrical engineer and it was this activity that was considered by the ITU commissions, but the position of electrical engineer is not my profession, therefore, throughout the year I performed unskilled labor.

By virtue of Art. 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, each party must prove the circumstances to which it refers as the basis for its claims and objections, unless otherwise provided by federal law. During the trial, documents were presented confirming the existence of grounds for establishing my disability and the percentage of loss of professional ability, but all my arguments were ignored by the court.

Accordingly, the court gave a one-sided assessment of the evidence collected in the case, a number of evidence was left without analysis and evaluation. These circumstances led to the adoption of an illegal and unfounded decision, which grossly violates my rights and deprives me of the opportunity to fully realize my rights and legitimate interests.

Moreover, in accordance with paragraphs. 18.19 Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No.__ dated __________ (with subsequent amendments and additions) “On the application of the norms of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation when considering cases in the court of first instance,” based on the requirements of the law on procedural equality of the parties and taking into account the obligation of the plaintiff and defendant to confirm those circumstances to which they refer, it is necessary during the trial to carefully check each circumstance indicated by the parties in support of their claims and objections, and thereby ensure the establishment of the truth in the case.

If the court or persons participating in the case have doubts regarding the reliability of the evidence being examined, they must be resolved by comparison with other established or indisputable facts, checking the correctness of the content and execution of the document, appointing an examination if necessary, etc.

By refusing to satisfy the claims, the court of the first, cassation and supervisory instances did not take measures to objectively study the circumstances of the case; these circumstances led to the adoption of an illegal and unfounded decision, which grossly violates my rights and deprives me of the opportunity to fully realize my rights and legitimate interests.

In all of the above circumstances, violation by the court of the first, cassation and supervisory instances of the rules of substantive and procedural law admitted during the consideration of the case is an unconditional basis for the cancellation of the decisions taken in the case.

1. Request a civil case in the __________________ district court of __________________ against ____ “______” to appeal the decision of ___ “_____” dated _____, and initiate supervisory proceedings. 2. Determination of the judicial panel on civil cases of the __________ regional court dated __________, determination of the judge of the _____________ city court dated _____________, Determination of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated _____________, response of the Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated _______ in a civil case on the claim _________________ to _____ “________” on appealing the decision ______ “_______” dated __________________ – cancel. 3. Refer the civil case for a new trial.

1. receipt for payment of state duty; 2. copy of the supervisory complaint; 3. Decision of the ___________ district court of _______ dated ____________ 4. Determination of the judicial panel for civil cases of the _______ regional court dated _____________ 5. Determination of the judge of the _________ city court dated ____________ 6. Determination of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated _____________ 7. Reply of the Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from ________

Methods of circulation

The procedure for drawing up and submitting a claim to the highest arbitration authority is strictly regulated by Russian legislation. There are time limits for filing, which depend on the nature of the case.

Important: you can find out the exact criteria and deadlines for a specific issue on the official website of the RF Armed Forces.

full name of the structure to which the paper is sent;
applicant's details;
data on the disputed issue: participants, list of legal procedures completed;
additionally, all structures (including non-state) participating or related to the case are named;
the main theses of the contested decision;
reasons and grounds for appeal.

A sample application can be submitted for consideration in the following ways:

bring in person;
send by registered mail;
send via email;
write and send in the appropriate section on the department’s website.

At the time of submitting the application, a state fee must be paid. Persons belonging to the following categories are exempt from this obligation: disabled people, WWII veterans, heroes of the Russian Federation or the USSR. Also, payment is not required for claims regulating labor, property and other types of civil relationships.

Cassation appeal to the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

Who can file a complaint

Return of complaint

Appeal

Russian legislation stipulates that absolutely any citizen of Russia can file a complaint with the Supreme Court. It is important that there have been previous attempts to resolve the issue in lower authorities. The basis for an appeal is the desire of the parties (or one of them) to establish justice that was not achieved in previous legal attempts.

We suggest you read: I was framed for theft at work, what should I do?

Examples include the following situations:

Disagreement of the convicted person (or his representative) with the court decision. Contact the supervisory authority.
The prosecutor does not agree with the decision and believes that the established measures are not sufficient.
Persons whose interests have been violated as a result of a previous or current decision in the case.

COMPLAINT about the lack of response to the complaint to the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation V. M. Lebedev against the ruling of the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation O. V. Nikolaeva No. 41-KAS19-1125 of August 30, 2021